Taboolicious.xxx That’s the one with the incest porn. If the name of the site isn’t enough to give it away the only other way to find out is to visit the site. Even there they play sort of coy and don’t come right out and say that it’s incest porn on the main page, but when they talk about “family fun” it become pretty obvious what they’re talking about.
Jaycee
Hm. They probably can’t come out and say it outright because it would cause them trouble (I suspect) with credit card and hosting companies. Not my cup of tea, personally, but considering my own perverse offerings on this site, who am I to judge…
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
1
Gallstone
You’re the guy in charge of the site, who is NOT running incest porn.
Jaycee
I think what I’m saying is, there are plenty of people who are offended by Bloomin’ Faeries! and its contents. It would be pretty hypocritical of me to start judging other people’s fantasies just because I don’t share them.
I would understand removing the ad if it was really distasteful, but that’s not the case here. It’s a pretty ad. And it has bewbs. That makes it very good…
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
1
Pry
Yeah… I appreciate your even-handedness, but I’m not sure incest qualifies as harmless fantasy. Still, point made.
Jaycee
Fantasies are, almost by their very definition, harmless. Actions can be harmful. If it’s determined that fantasies lead to actions, then yes, fantasies could be considered potentially harmful, but evidence suggests that having fantasies reduces the taste for action, not increase it.
Also, it’s been argued that Bloomin’ Faeries! is about rape fantasies. If I hold that next to incest fantasies, there’s a clear winner in my head as to which one is worse. That’s kind of why I’m not standing on a high horse…
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
1
Gallstone
I have a hard time calling the stuff that goes on in your comics ‘rape’.
What the faeries do is nasty, but I’ll at least give them credit for ensuring that both humans involved receive pleasure — until the spell ends and the embarrassment and disappointment set in.
Jaycee
I agree with you, I wouldn’t call it rape either, but there are strong non-consensual undertones to many of the storylines. Some people would definitely consider this morally appalling, just as some others feel about incest (even incest between consenting adults). I’m not sure that there being pleasure involved affects the morality of the curses, but it’s certainly fun for us to watch (well, to me anyway… ;).
*LULZ* it has a picture of Michael Jackson in it’s cache folder *PMSL*
It should be noted that its CARTOON incest porn. I think it is illegal to create graphics of minors in sexual acts if the graphics are nearly indistinguishable from reality, or represent a real minor but the site is all pretty obvious cartoonish.
Seems to lean towards young boys having sex with older female relatives including mothers, aunts and sisters although there are some gallery images of young girls parodying mainstream cartoon characters.
Looking into the research myself, evidence seems to suggest that viewing child or rape pornography neither increases or decreases the desire or likely-hood to commit the act. The vast majority of pedophiles surveyed have either viewed or possessed child pornography and it didn’t stop them, but another study on people convicted of possession with no conviction for rape or pedophilia showed a very low offence rate to commit such acts later, compared to those who had committed such acts.
I think Jaycee is right. The add it’self isn’t showing any of the actual kid stuff and its certainly hard to argue the high ground considering BloomingFaerie’s own content. If anything I’d be more worried about the Tekuho add depicting Ben10’s own 10 year old Gwen Tennyson
If you’re talking about *child pornography*, then yeah, I’m with you. But incest (sex in the family) doesn’t equate child pornography. (And to be honest, I haven’t registered to Taboolicious to go check the content–seems like an excessive way of validating advertisement…)
Re: pedophiles. I’d love to read some research on this. Can you send me some links?
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
1
Pry
All true; I should have been more specific. My observation was based on the fact that at least one member of all the incestuous couples I saw depicted was a minor!
One thing that annoying yellow-gnat did right (and probably totally not intentional): she made the Sorceress intelligent (way more intelligent than hir male form anyway)
Well he/she/it was always intelligent. However since the yellow “bitch” faerie (as I will call her for now until she is given a name in the strip) has changed the royal wizard, he seems to be more focused rather than just a perverted old man (which clouded his decisions and judgments in previous strips).
On the real note of the actual comic it looks like lurker is a bit more lusted than his decent side can handle. Even with the distraction I can’t imagine a long-term solution that could help. If Heather gets sick of it I’m guessing she’ll either behead him or have him shipped far away presuming distance can cure it.
Beyond that the wizard/ess may come up with a way to curb any and all sexual desire… at least towards Heather.
33 thoughts on “#0178: Overkill, Perhaps?”
Urazz
Well, that’s one way to get his mind off of Heather.
TJ
wait, how dare he think she look ugly, guy needs a slap, lol.
BFF (Blooming Faeries Fan)
Who think who is ugly? o.O I don’t think there was anything about being ugly, just being freaked out about a woman with a talking penis.
TJ
Relooking, maybe your right, it seem like he freaked out of that, but it could have been the extra part, heh
Gallstone
Wow, the wizard’s new anatomy is finally useful.
BFF (Blooming Faeries Fan)
Right? XD
lockezero
Surprise! Penis!
Pry
Ew, there’s an ad on the site for incest porn. That’s… not right.
#1 Thane Fan
Become a member, it is worth it.
Jaycee
Which ad is that?
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
Lunaroki
Taboolicious.xxx That’s the one with the incest porn. If the name of the site isn’t enough to give it away the only other way to find out is to visit the site. Even there they play sort of coy and don’t come right out and say that it’s incest porn on the main page, but when they talk about “family fun” it become pretty obvious what they’re talking about.
Jaycee
Hm. They probably can’t come out and say it outright because it would cause them trouble (I suspect) with credit card and hosting companies. Not my cup of tea, personally, but considering my own perverse offerings on this site, who am I to judge…
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
Gallstone
You’re the guy in charge of the site, who is NOT running incest porn.
Jaycee
I think what I’m saying is, there are plenty of people who are offended by Bloomin’ Faeries! and its contents. It would be pretty hypocritical of me to start judging other people’s fantasies just because I don’t share them.
I would understand removing the ad if it was really distasteful, but that’s not the case here. It’s a pretty ad. And it has bewbs. That makes it very good…
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
Pry
Yeah… I appreciate your even-handedness, but I’m not sure incest qualifies as harmless fantasy. Still, point made.
Jaycee
Fantasies are, almost by their very definition, harmless. Actions can be harmful. If it’s determined that fantasies lead to actions, then yes, fantasies could be considered potentially harmful, but evidence suggests that having fantasies reduces the taste for action, not increase it.
Also, it’s been argued that Bloomin’ Faeries! is about rape fantasies. If I hold that next to incest fantasies, there’s a clear winner in my head as to which one is worse. That’s kind of why I’m not standing on a high horse…
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
Gallstone
I have a hard time calling the stuff that goes on in your comics ‘rape’.
What the faeries do is nasty, but I’ll at least give them credit for ensuring that both humans involved receive pleasure — until the spell ends and the embarrassment and disappointment set in.
Jaycee
I agree with you, I wouldn’t call it rape either, but there are strong non-consensual undertones to many of the storylines. Some people would definitely consider this morally appalling, just as some others feel about incest (even incest between consenting adults). I’m not sure that there being pleasure involved affects the morality of the curses, but it’s certainly fun for us to watch (well, to me anyway… ;).
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
charles81
*LULZ* it has a picture of Michael Jackson in it’s cache folder *PMSL*
It should be noted that its CARTOON incest porn. I think it is illegal to create graphics of minors in sexual acts if the graphics are nearly indistinguishable from reality, or represent a real minor but the site is all pretty obvious cartoonish.
Seems to lean towards young boys having sex with older female relatives including mothers, aunts and sisters although there are some gallery images of young girls parodying mainstream cartoon characters.
Looking into the research myself, evidence seems to suggest that viewing child or rape pornography neither increases or decreases the desire or likely-hood to commit the act. The vast majority of pedophiles surveyed have either viewed or possessed child pornography and it didn’t stop them, but another study on people convicted of possession with no conviction for rape or pedophilia showed a very low offence rate to commit such acts later, compared to those who had committed such acts.
I think Jaycee is right. The add it’self isn’t showing any of the actual kid stuff and its certainly hard to argue the high ground considering BloomingFaerie’s own content. If anything I’d be more worried about the Tekuho add depicting Ben10’s own 10 year old Gwen Tennyson
Jaycee
If you’re talking about *child pornography*, then yeah, I’m with you. But incest (sex in the family) doesn’t equate child pornography. (And to be honest, I haven’t registered to Taboolicious to go check the content–seems like an excessive way of validating advertisement…)
Re: pedophiles. I’d love to read some research on this. Can you send me some links?
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
Pry
All true; I should have been more specific. My observation was based on the fact that at least one member of all the incestuous couples I saw depicted was a minor!
Pry
Re: the Tekuho ad. Ah, I did not know that character. Indeed, ick.
Guesticus
One thing that annoying yellow-gnat did right (and probably totally not intentional): she made the Sorceress intelligent (way more intelligent than hir male form anyway)
#1 Thane Fan
Well he/she/it was always intelligent. However since the yellow “bitch” faerie (as I will call her for now until she is given a name in the strip) has changed the royal wizard, he seems to be more focused rather than just a perverted old man (which clouded his decisions and judgments in previous strips).
Guesticus
More focused works (considering shi has to put up with Herman and Violet/Velvet {still can’t remember her correct name :(})
charles81
On the real note of the actual comic it looks like lurker is a bit more lusted than his decent side can handle. Even with the distraction I can’t imagine a long-term solution that could help. If Heather gets sick of it I’m guessing she’ll either behead him or have him shipped far away presuming distance can cure it.
Beyond that the wizard/ess may come up with a way to curb any and all sexual desire… at least towards Heather.
Lurker
Ouch!
Casey
Am I wrong to think that I’d do the fairies, the princess, that sexy sexy guard, AND the SheHe wizard??
Jaycee
Get in line, buddy. Well, except for the wizardess, you can have her. 😉
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
Gallstone
We still don’t even know whether faeries CAN have sex…
Jaycee
Well, don’t wanna be crass, but they’ve got bewbs and they’ve got mouths. We’re off to a good start…
–Jaycee
“I’m doing it.”
Urazz
Well, one way we can find out is if Thane ever gets shrunk down to their size. lol
pedantic one
And fingers . . . can’t forget the fingers.
Bloomin’ Newsletter