#617: Chapter 16 – Page 07

10 thoughts on “#617: Chapter 16 – Page 07”

  1. This definitely feels evil….. but that body though…

  2. Loving this one!
    So she has wings now. I wonder about her height…

  3. OK, the animation is quite striking, and the colors are great even though they are subdued. Is the Forrester actually the Faerie Queen? If not, why would he want to keep Heather’s body? I wouldn’t mind Borrowing it for a time, although I don’t want to wear it, just use it,(Wink, Wink). And what, exactly is the Heart of the Forest? Obviously, it is a powerfully Magical Jewel, but does it contain the Spirit of the Faerie Queen, or does her power reside in it? And what will happen to all the huge Breasts that were created? Will all of those Funbags go bye-bye? Gee, I sure ask a lot of questions.

    1. Those are genuinely good questions.

      In true mercantile fashion, I’ll say that many of the answers are already available on my Patreon. My backers are about 8-9 months ahead of schedule versus the website 😉

      –Jaycee

  4. I wonder if this means Heather is the Fairy Queen. He needed Heather’s body after all.

    1. All shall be explained in due time. Of course, you could always become a Patreon backer and get all the answers right now. 😉

      —Jaycee

  5. the Dread Pirate Roburts

    It’s interesting that Jaycee is willing to draw uncensored wang but not any pussy… cats.

    1. This is an “interesting” use of the word interesting. It is generally used to imply something reprehensible that could be easily resolved with a genuine question.

      It’s also worth noting that I am not an artist and I don’t illustrate the comic.

      –Jaycee

      1. the Bread Pirate Roburts

        I beg for your forgiveness, I forgot you aren’t the comic’s artist. I’m also looking up the definition of “interesting”.

        1. Sorry, I was being snarky and you deserve an apology. The word “interesting” is one of my pet peeves (and has been for decades). People use it too often dishonestly and to suggest a “truth” (often little more than an unsubstantiated opinion) and say it’s “interesting” to lead their interlocutor to the same conclusion. For example, someone might say: “There is a document floating around online that claims the entire pandemic was simulated by a secret tech company three years before it happened. It’s very interesting.” It’s fallacious and it’s dishonest, and it’s so common that people fall for it all the time. At a time when disinformation is at an all-time high, I tend to be overly sensitive about intellectual dishonesty. So if your use of “interesting” was to mean “I just noticed that pattern and I’m genuinely fascinated and curious about it,” we’re good and I apologize for being snarky. If it was more in the other sense, to suggest some kind of conspiracy or nefarious intent on my (or Wondollar’s) part, then that’s the second group.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Joins us (FREE) on